Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Unfortunate utilization of acronyms

Via Drudge:  Some British scientists with too much time on their hands did a huge study on penis size.  They found the average size to be 5.16 inches utilizing 15000 units from around the world as their sample(mainly European and Middle Eastern men though).

Apparently 2.28% of men have abnormally small units and 2.28% are wicked large, but those were not quantified in the yahoo article.

They hasten to add that they found no correlation between a man's member and the size of his feet.

And now to the unfortunate acronym:  they submitted their article to the British Journal of Urology (BJU). I was able to take the article seriously until I saw that......

Friday, February 27, 2015

Rest in Peace, Leonard Nimoy

One of the icons of my formative years...

ETA:  I was trying to think of some tribute that an actor would appreciate.  The one thing I could come up with is:  Every time (I mean every single frickin' time) that Spock dies in Wrath of Khan, I cry.  Doesn't matter how many times I've seen it, the waterworks start.  I think that maybe Nimoy would understand what that means.

Sunday, February 22, 2015

Nuance or just plain dumb?

If someone tries to 'clarify' their comments by saying that what they said was 'too nuanced' to be understood by the general public, that perhaps their comments were just too dumb to be believed.

Sunday, February 15, 2015

And we're supposed to care why???

Via The Gateway Pundit:  Clerics in Pakistan have declared Valentine's Day to be Un-Islamic and therefore the world should basically stop celebrating it.  Tyranny at its finest.  They might as well be liberals--I don't like it, so no one should be allowed to do it.  And they're protesting (because they weren't able to find anything else to protest about this week). 

They are protesting cute, overpriced teddy bears, gifts of cards, flowers, jewelry, and candy and general romance and well-wishing.   Warning auto-video in Urdu on the link below:

The clerics said that events like Valentine’s Day that violate the dignity of mutual respect and relations.
Yeeeeah....  "mutual respect and relations"--rape, stoning, throwing people off of buildings.  Not convinced.

To be fair, I have never really celebrated Valentine's Day, but that's my choice, not based on the declaration of some stuck-in-the-5th century fucktard.

Sunday, February 1, 2015

Snowy days....

Mr B has to be at work today, so I'm literally keeping the home fires burning.  What to do on a snowy February day?  Bake some bread, feed the birds, keep the wood stove stoked and then maybe later start up the tractor and use the front-loader to clear the driveway.  And laundry, if only to get some humidity into the air.

Air America was on this morning, political messages aside, a fun movie to watch and the flying reminds me of some good friends and friends of friends.  Follow that up with some Space Cowboys and some Constantine from Friday night.

Just an ordinary day in the life.

Saturday, January 31, 2015

UVA-Creating a whole generation of victims

So, women, especially sorority women at the University of Virginia are being told that they are such helpless twaits, that they must be ordered to stay home on Saturday nights.  Moreover, they are being told that all men are evil nasty predators that cannot be trusted.  So I wonder a couple of things: 1) are the non-sorority chicks, those who are not of the 'select' and live in dorms, actually self-sufficient or are just not fainting reeds or perhaps are just throwaways to the ruling elite so they don't also have to be ordered to stay home?;  2)  are the sorority chicks actually stupid enough to do so, bowing to the Voice of Authority, and so acquiesce to becoming victims and playing into the Ultimate Sun Tsu Divide and Conquer (creating an 'enemy' that one cannot be without)?. 

All based on a lie in Rolling Stone, that bastion of legitimate reporting.

Friday, January 16, 2015

Religious practice versus Respect

I finally got it.  And ironically enough, it was Pope Francis that got whatever synapse firing in my brain.  The whole thing about Charlie Hebdo and free speech.  So here it is and I'm hoping that I can state it clear enough for everyone not in my brain to understand.

It is part of the Muslim religion to not have images of any person.  It is part of their both their orthodoxy and their orthopraxy.  It is only peripherally spelled out in the Koran, which prohibits idolatry.  It was under this orthopraxy that the Taliban destroyed the Buddhas in Afghanistan.

Now the problem with orthopraxy is that suffers from 'mission creep'.  So a ban on idolatry becomes a ban on human images, etc. etc. etc.

So now, Muslims use the publication of images of Mohammad whatever as an excuse to kill people.   And they are saying, and the mainstream media is carrying the meme, that no one should be able to publish pictures of Mohammad.

But here's the kicker.  If someone is not a practicing Muslim, it is not part of their orthopraxy to NOT create pictures or publish pictures of Mohammad.  Buddhist orthopraxy does not prohibit the creation of images of Buddha.  Christian orthopraxy, which also has a ban on idolatry, does not prohibit the creation of images of Jesus. 

So what's going on by all of these people, including the Pope, are saying that no one in the world should create images of Mohammad, is that all of us, by proxy, have to adhere to the orthopraxy of Islam.  Britain is already banning the use of cartoon pigs in children's schoolbooks due to another Islamic orthopraxy.

But guess what, I'm not a Muslim.  I am not going to adhere to their orthopraxy.  I am going to enjoy bacon, keep my head uncovered unless it is cold, and I am going to publish whatever the hell I want.  I am not going to be forced via political correctness to convert by proxy and practice a religion that is not mine.